(2018). Free Speech and Controversial Speakers: Public Institutions' Legal Responsibility and Recommendations for Response. College and University, v93 n4 p25-28 Nov. Recently, public higher education institutions have experienced an increase in requests from extreme political figures from both the right and left to speak on campus. College administrators must comply with laws and fulfill their legal responsibilities while addressing concerns about campus safety–including those held by students and faculty. This article is in three parts: The first reviews free speech principles and relevant legal cases; the second examines recent requests by controversial figures to speak on public campuses and steps institutions have taken to protect free speech; and the third recommends best practices that institutions should consider when responding to requests to host controversial figures on campus…. [Direct]
(2020). Conflicting Opinions: Speech Rights and Student Protests on College Campuses. Journal of Student Affairs, New York University, v16 p74-82. College students have a widespread history of exercising their rights to free speech through protest as a means of expressing displeasure with the status quo. While some administrators consider it a disruption to academic learning on college campuses, extensive research has found that student activism as a form of involvement on campus lends itself to the development of leadership qualities that contribute to being an agent of social change and higher levels of civic engagement (Biddix, 2014; Chambers & Phelps, 1993; Kezar et al., 2017). Several institutions are working to balance speech protections while maintaining an inclusive environment for students. Some states and universities, however, have implemented or revised policies to protect freedom of expression regardless of its content in order to uphold students' First Amendment rights. Speech rights are actively debated by college administrators and policymakers across the country in response to the increase in campus… [PDF]
(2022). Legal Challenges to Bias Response Teams on College Campuses. Educational Researcher, v51 n6 p431-435 Aug-Sep. Over the last 3 years, the advocacy organization Speech First has filed six lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of bias response teams on the grounds that they violate free speech. Bias response teams are university-wide committees that respond to reports of racially charged incidents on college campuses to promote institutional goals of inclusion. These lawsuits are significant because they have resulted in the dismantling of these committees. In this commentary, we bring attention to this renewed wave of legal attacks on racial diversity and inclusion policies on college campuses and its implications for race-focused policy, practice, and research…. [Direct]
(2024). Using Video Diaries in Educational Ethnography: What Being Alone with a Camera Does for Self-Representation, Trust, and Affording a Participant Perspective. Ethnography and Education, v19 n4 p333-352. Video diaries are an innovative tool for ethnographic research, contributing to the quality of fieldwork and ethnographic data by giving additional attention to participant voices. Grounded in two fieldwork periods in secondary and higher education, this paper illustrates three key qualities through which video diaries contributed to ethnographic research: (1) Building trusting relationships with participants, (2) providing a space for participant autonomy, and (3) being a medium of self-explication and truth-telling. In video diaries, participants exercised free speech, providing a widely unmediated, personal perspective on their professional identity, roles, and relationships. This personal perspective allowed participants to contribute to trusting on their own terms, which mitigated face-work — especially when talking about conflicts and challenges — and provided additional entry points for conversations, enabling deep dialogue and understanding. Ultimately, the use of video… [Direct]
(2024). Non-Native Accents among School Beginners and Teacher Expectations for Future Student Achievements. Sociology of Education, v97 n1 p76-96. Based on sociological, economic, and social-psychological theories of discrimination and bias, this study addresses non-native accents among ethnic minority students as they begin school and explores effects of such accents on their teachers' achievement expectations. Using a unique data set of first graders in Germany, the analysis reveals that a non-native accent is relevant to teachers' expectations net of student skills, abilities, and other background variables. Associations are stronger in the language domain than in mathematics, indicating that teachers perceive accent-free speech as a language-learning requirement. However, residual influences of non-native accents on teacher expectations also exist in the math domain and persist even after prolonged periods of teacher-student interaction. Mechanisms of statistical discrimination and stereotype-based discrimination can partially explain these effects. However, the overall pattern of results suggests a stigmatization of… [Direct]
(2023). Teachers' Social Media Use and Its Legal Implications. William & Mary Educational Review, v8 n1 Article 4 2022-2023. As society becomes increasingly dependent on technology, school leaders must navigate the evolution of websites, resources, and platforms, including social media, as part of their responsibility to facilitate a safe and productive learning environment for students. This article reviews both constitutional and case law as a means of informing educational leaders of their rights and duties, as well as providing a foundation upon which effective K-12 social media policies and practices for educators can be built. Specifically, we offer an analysis of landmark cases involving the First Amendment and free speech, the delicacy around teachers' roles as both public employees and private citizens, and recent court cases involving social media use. Additionally, we propose guidelines around social media use, compiled from both practitioners in the field and relevant literature…. [PDF]
(2017). Chinese High School Students' Perceptions of Freedom of Expression: Implications for Researching Emerging Civil Liberties in Global Educational Contexts. Asia Pacific Education Review, v18 n1 p53-64 Mar. This study explored attitudes and perceptions of Chinese high school students regarding freedom of expression in their country. A survey capturing perceptions over various forms of free speech (e.g., student publication, dress code) was administered to a sample of 838, which included students from both urban and rural areas within Shaanxi Province in northwest China. A factor analysis and CFA model were administered to confirm survey validity and reliability. A factorial MANOVA was then used to explore differences across gender, grade, and region groups. The findings revealed students largely supported free speech rights but their responses varied to some degree by setting and student age. In general, urban students reported more positive attitudes about their school environment regarding expression and older participants were more likely to be supportive of free speech. All in all, findings suggest that free speech rights are important matters for adolescents in both modern and… [Direct]
(2018). Civility and Academic Freedom: Who Defines the Former (and How) May Imperil Rights to the Latter. College Quarterly, v21 n1. An alarming occurrence in academia involves the discipline of faculty, under the guise of violating civility or collegiality codes, for engaging in what should be protected academic free speech. This often occurs when unprincipled and/or corporate-minded administrators seek to punish or dissuade faculty from challenging or questioning their decisions or policy initiatives, or for speaking up about policy violations or lack of due process. The ambiguity of terms such as civility and collegiality, when selectively defined by administrators, can be used to stifle, dissuade or punish academic free speech. Ways to identify and address these problems are presented…. [PDF]
(2016). Campus Free Speech Presents Both Legal and PR Challenges for Colleges. New England Journal of Higher Education, Apr. Free speech is fast becoming a hot-button issue at colleges across the country, with campus protests often mirroring those of the public-at-large on issues such as racism or tackling institution-specific matters such as college governance. On the surface, the issue of campus free speech may seem like a purely legal concern, yet in reality, colleges should also treat it as a public relations problem. In this article, the authors discuss how planning, communication, and positive messaging can help colleges maintain a safe and orderly campus when coping with the challenges of free speech…. [Direct]
(2020). Kazoo Training for L2 Pronunciation Practice and Reduced Foreign Accentedness?. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, v14 n3 p290-302. This paper presents a controlled pretest-training-posttest study on using a small membraphone instrument called "kazoo" for L2 pronunciation practice and reducing foreign accentedness. Learners were recorded for free speech before and after a six-week pronunciation and oral skills course including L2 prosody training with personal kazoos. A control group did not receive any kazoo training but did similar tasks in regular speech. Samples of all learners' free speech before and after the course were rated for foreign accentedness by L1 speakers. In addition, learners taking part in the kazoo group were interviewed in focus groups to ascertain their views on kazoo training. The results imply that the kazoo has potential as a pronunciation teaching and learning tool. Even if a group-specific analysis did not yield clear results, developing on an individual level was more common in the kazoo group. Moreover, many of the learners found positive aspects about kazooing. However,… [Direct]
(2018). Cracking the Code: A Practical Guide for University Free Speech Policies. HEPI Report 109. Higher Education Policy Institute At the start of 2018, the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI) was approached by the parliamentary Joint Committee for Human Rights (JCHR) to conduct an independent piece of research into the efficacy of university codes of practice on freedom of speech. The research formed part of the evidence base for the JCHR's 2017/18 inquiry into whether freedom of speech is being suppressed in UK universities. This report leads on from where the HEPI report for the JCHR left off, by seeking to provide a practical guide for UK higher education institutions when preparing or updating institutional policies on freedom of speech. It aims to build on what works, as well as what does not, in existing free speech policies formulated and employed by higher education institutions across the UK. In doing so, it presents a practical guide to the sector, which could be consulted, not only by institutions in England under the new regulatory landscape of the Office for Students (OfS), but also by higher… [PDF]
(2016). "Free Speech" and "Political Correctness". European Journal of Higher Education, v6 n4 p417-420. "Free speech" and "political correctness" are best seen not as opposing principles, but as part of a spectrum. Rather than attempting to establish some absolute principles, this essay identifies four trends that impact on this debate: (1) there are, and always have been, legitimate debates about the–absolute–beneficence of science; (2) a shift towards a more confused, fractured, volatile and ideologically diverse global environment; (3) the rise of so-called "identity" politics; and (4) the student base of twenty-first century mass higher education systems is much more heterogeneous than that of the elite university systems they replaced–and, arguably, more heterodox as a result. Two conclusions can be drawn from the impact of these changes on the tone of the debate about "free speech" and "political correctness". The first is that there are, and never have been, any absolutes. No campus, although the university should offer a… [Direct]
(2019). Exploring Free Speech on College Campuses. Hearing of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, First Session on Examining Free Speech on College Campuses (October 26, 2017). Senate Hearing 115-660. US Senate This hearing of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions explores free speech on college campuses. Following an opening statement by Honorable Lamar Alexander (Chairman, Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions), the following senators provide statements: (1) Honorable Patty Murray, U.S. Senator from the State of Washington; (2) Honorable Todd Young, U.S. Senator from the State of Indiana; (3) Honorable Michael F. Bennet, U.S. Senator from the State of Colorado; (4) Honorable Johnny Isakson, U.S. Senator from the State of Georgia; Honorable Margaret Wood Hassan, U.S. Senator from the State of New Hampshire; (5) Honorable Elizabeth Warren, U.S. Senator from the State of Massachusetts; and (6) Honorable Tim Kaine, U.S. Senator from the State of Virginia. Prepared witness statements are offered by: (1) Dr. Robert Zimmer, President, The University of Chicago, Illinois; (2) Nadine Strossen, John Marshall Harlan II., Professor of Law, New York Law School, New… [PDF]
(2024). Diversity of Thought: Protecting Free Speech on College Campuses. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Development of the Committee on Education and the Workforce. U.S. House of Representatives, One One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, First Session (March 29, 2023). Serial No. 118-4. US House of Representatives This document records testimony from a hearing before the Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Development of the Committee on Education and the Workforce on protecting free speech on college campuses. Opening statements were provided by: (1) Honorable Burgess Owens, Chairman, Subcommittee on Higher Education and the Workforce Development; and (2) Honorable Robert C. Scott, "Bobby." Ranking Member, Committee on Education and the Workforce. Witness statements were provided by: (1) Cherise Trump, Executive Director, Speech First, Washington, D.C.; (2) Josiah Joner Executive Editor, The Stanford Review, Stanford, California; (3) Suzanne Nossel, Chief Executive Officer, Pen America; and (4) Ilya Shaprio, Director of Constitutional Studies, Manhattan Institute, New York, New York. Additional submissions include: (1) Honorable Jim Banks, a Representative in Congress from the State of Indiana: Report dated December 8, 2021 from The Heritage Foundation; (2) Honorable Suzanne… [PDF]
(2017). Ideology, Utopia and Islam on Campus: How to Free Speech a Little from Its Own Terrors. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, v12 n2 p159-176 Jul. A dominant narrative on many British campuses is "Prevent," which is part of the government's counter-terror policy, an ideology based on fear. Muslims, in particular, are considered to be at risk of radicalisation on campus, and being under suspicion makes them self-censor. Additionally, the no-platforming student lobby creates a utopian, idealised atmosphere that seeks to reduce dissent. Self-censorship and no-platforming are reducing the diversity of opinions expressed at universities, yet there is no evidence of illegality on campus. Spinoza, JS Mill and Hannah Arendt demanded various forms of free speech for a healthy society, and the free speech issue is the key to "Prevent" which suppresses opinions that are different from the dominant government narratives. The challenge now, in the tide of BREXIT and Trump, is how to free speech, even a little, from the pincer grip of establishment ideology and student utopia. Between the extremes of ideology and utopia… [Direct]