(2003). The Exception to the Rule: Government Employers' Right To Restrict Free Speech of Employees. Journal of College and University Law, v29 n3 p719-44. Examines the current state of First Amendment rights of faculty at public colleges and universities. Using as a focus the recent case of Crue v. Aiken, analyzes the place of the prior restraint doctrine and the treatment of public employees in the free speech context, arriving at a conclusion that offers an extension of the restrictions allowed by public colleges and universities as government employers. (EV)…
(2002). The Emergence of a Fourth Type of Public Forum: Is the Quasi-Nonpublic Forum a New Paradigm for Student Free Speech Cases?. This paper is a presentation, in outline form, of the development of the "quasi-nonpublic forum," where cases involving student free speech push the envelope of what is acceptable under Constitutional law and what is appropriate/acceptable student behavior under constraints set by school regulations. Context is set by presenting court decisions regarding students' constitutional rights, such as "Tinker versus Des Moines Independent Community School District" (students wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War) and "Hazelwood School District versus Kulhmeier," in which school administration excised material from the school-sponsored newspaper. Later cases tell of the erosion of the Tinker/Fraser/Kulhmeier Standard, students' constitutional rights not being co-extensive with those of adults, and the drawing of the line involving religious proselytizing on school grounds during school session hours. The cases presented demonstrate a convergence of…
(1974). ERIC Reports: Liberty or License? Teaching Students Freedom of Speech. Speech Teacher, 23, 1, 72-6, Jan 74. Annotated list of ERIC processed documents on the rationale for teaching freedom of speech, some free speech issues, and teaching resources. (CH)…
(1993). Free Speech for Public School Students: A "Basic Educational Mission.". Noting that recent Supreme Court decisions (including Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier and Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser) moved markedly away from protecting students' First Amendment rights, this paper examined justifications for granting public school students freedom of expression. Rather than looking at where students' First Amendment rights stand, the paper's focus is on where they should be. The paper notes that courts have granted students expressive rights (such as the case of "Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District"), but then essentially withdrew them on legal (public forum) and educational (inculcating the majority's values) grounds that can lead only to continually diminished protection for students' freedom of expression. The paper argues that the approach should have been–and should be–utilizing freedom of expression rationales which are advocated for society at large. Arguing that the First Amendment is instrumental in… [PDF]
(1990). Racist-Sexist-Hate Speech on College Campuses: Free Speech v. Equal Protection. On college campuses today, the debate rages over whether self-restraint and tolerance for nonconformity is overriding a need to protect certain individuals and groups from objectionable speech. Some administrators, students, and alumni wish to prevent "bad speech" in the form of expressions of racism, sexism, and the like. Advocates for limiting "bad speech" argue that such expressions do not deserve first amendment protection because the messages cause irreparable harm and are meant to do so. Some researchers argue that the right to privacy which has been identified within the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment can limit sexist-racist-hate speech, but the Supreme Court's integrationist reading of the clause contradicts such a view. More speech, not less, is needed to break down the walls of classification, educate others, and provide for equality. Banning hate speech creates an exception to the first amendment which denigrates its meaning…. [PDF]
(1972). The Relationship of Age, Sex, Education and Urbanization to Free Speech Attitudes. This paper reports the findings of two surveys, compares them to previous research, and discusses the combined implications. Both surveys, (the first, conducted in Denmark in 1969; and the second, in Chicago and Evanston, Illinois, in 1971) reinforced previous findings of significant correlations between attitudes toward freedom of speech and the variables of age, sex, education, and urbanization. The author further discusses liberality of attitude as correlated with intravariable differences such as was found among younger and older adults, and suburban and central city residents, etc. From the collective research data a hypothesis is derived, namely, that levels of tolerance increase or diminish as the modes of expression in question appear to serve or threaten vested interests. (Author/LG)… [PDF]
(1970). Students in Court: Free Speech and the Functions of Schooling in America. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 4, 567-95, Nov '70. …
(1991). Teaching Free Speech in Advertising Classrooms (Approaches to Teaching Freedom of Expression). Journalism Educator, v46 n2 p25-30 Sum. Argues that free expression is an important concept to teach to introductory advertising students. Explains how free expression can be taught through student role playing within a talk show format. Reports research showing student enthusiasm for the method. Concludes that the method can be successful in the large lecture classroom format. (SG)…
(1978). Freedom of Speech Rights of Public School Students. This paper discusses the legal aspects of public school students' First Amendment free speech rights in the school setting. Tinker v. Des Moines School District, the most notable court decision upholding free speech rights, is used as a basis for discussion throughout. The paper reviews the current legal status of students' free speech rights as seen in post-Tinker Vietnam-related cases and race-related cases. Also discussed are students' rights to receive information and to refuse to participate in the flag salute. One section details problems involved with prohibiting the wearing of T-shirts with messages. The paper concludes that schools can prohibit the wearing of buttons and other emblems and insignia, picketing, the wearing of message-bearing clothing, and any speech that promotes diversion, disruption, or interference with the normal operation of the school. However, serious constitutional problems arise when schools limit rights protected by the First Amendment, such as…
(1987). Equal Vote to Equal Voice. Update on Law-Related Education, v11 n3 p34-35 Fall. Offers a hypothetical case as a learning activity in which government regulation of campaign advertising and free speech is questioned. Provides questions for discussion. (BSR)…
(2003). The First Amendment. Journal of College and University Law, v29 n2 p225-48. Summarizes some of 2001's more interesting and important court cases regarding free speech in higher education, commenting on their effects on case law. (EV)…
(1987). Freedom of Speech and Expression. Update on Law-Related Education, v11 n1 p23-24 Win. Using three landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases, this lesson teaches students in grades seven through twelve about the benefits and limits of free speech. (JDH)…
(1976). The Lingering Legacy of Pacifica: Broadcasters' Freedom of Silence. Journalism Quarterly, 53, 3, 429-33, Aut 76. Suggests that commercial broadcasters are less capable of identifying and reacting to violations of free speech than are individuals who regulate the communication channels. (Author/RB)…
(1990). The Pitfalls of Stifling Campus Speech. AGB Reports, v32 n1 p12-14 Jan-Feb. Rules designed to protect students from racism or sexism can run counter to free-speech guarantees. Programs fostering understanding might be a better alternative. (Author/MSE)…
(2006). When Animators Attack. Chronicle of Higher Education, v52 n23 pA29-A30 Feb. College administrators across the US are learning that chatter on e-mail, blogs, and social-networking sites can turn even minor faux pas into major controversies. The issue is discussed with reference to the firing of a teaching assistant whose Web site lampooned the president of Columbia College Chicago and left the institution facing serious questions about free speech and privacy…. [Direct]