(2001). Fighting Hate on Campus: A Primer for Administrators. The Bulletin, v69 n2 p10-15,32-33 Mar. Asserting that college administrators can take a proactive role when dealing with hate, discusses ways that they can prevent hate from spreading. Addresses: bigotry and intergroup strife, motivation behind acts of hate, alcohol and hate's correlation, free speech and university speech codes, possible responses to specific acts, and short-, medium-, and long-term solutions. (EV)…
(1996). Discrimination against Religious Viewpoints Prohibited in Public Colleges and Universities: An Analysis of "Rosenberger v The University of Virginia.". West's Education Law Quarterly, v5 n1 p52-68 Jan. "Rosenberger" prohibits public colleges and universities from discriminating against religious viewpoints in their allocation of student activities funds that are equally available to other groups. The Supreme Court decision also extends the range of facilities equally available to student religious organizations for free-speech activities beyond classroom space and auditoriums. (83 footnotes) (MLF)…
(1996). Public and Constitutional Support for Character Education. NASSP Bulletin, v80 n579 p55-62 Apr. Character education thrives on an informed understanding of constitutional principles and an inclusive commitment-building process. U.S. Supreme Court opinions that clarify public school students' free speech rights have established values education as a constitutionally acceptable practice. Challenges might lie in possible violations of the First Amendment's establishment and free exercise clauses. (31 references)…
(1998). Update '98. Canadian Social Studies, v32 n4 p116 Sum. Updates cases and issues previously discussed in this regular column on human rights in Canada, including racism and anti-Semitism, laws on hate crimes, hate sites on the World Wide Web, the use of the "free speech" defense by hate groups, and legal challenges to antiracist groups by individuals criticized by them. (DSK)…
(2001). Digital Privacy: Toward a New Politics and Discursive Practice. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), v35 p115-245. Discussion of privacy focuses on digital environments and a more inclusive understanding of privacy. Highlights include legal and policy conceptions; legislation protecting privacy; relevant Supreme Court cases; torts and privacy; European and other efforts; surveillance and social control; information entrepreneurialism; Jurgen Habermas; free speech; gendered perspectives; and privacy as property. (Contains 339 references.) (LRW)…
(1975). The Good Guys, the Bad Guys and the First Amendment: Free Speech vs. Fairness in Broadcasting. This book, an account of the "Red Lion" Supreme Court case and similar cases that arose after that decision, discusses the implications and problems inherent in enforcing the Federal Communications Commission's "Fairness Doctrine." After a detailed chronicle of the Red Lion case, the book relates applications of the Fairness Doctrine to commercial announcements, presidential use of television, and network distortion of the news. The book emphasizes that, in many of the cases and issues, it is difficult "to tell the good guys from the bad guys." (RL)…
(2007). Minding MySpace: Balancing the Benefits and Risks of Students' Online Social Networks. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, v73 n2 p4-8 Oct. As principal of the School of the Arts in San Francisco, Donn Harris is passionate about protecting his students' experiments in free expression. But about two years ago he encountered an example of creative student speech he couldn't support–a nasty post on the MySpace.com Web site that targeted some of the school's students. Deciding that his devotion to free speech had to take a back seat to his responsibility as a school administrator, Harris promptly suspended the responsible student and asked that the page be pulled off the Web. He called a school assembly to discuss the offensive MySpace page and asked students who had signed on as \friends\ of the site to apologize for the cruel statements they had endorsed. This article describes how Harris' dilemma is becoming increasingly common among schools across the country. Ideas on how educators can protect inexperienced social networkers are presented…. [Direct]
(1987). School Law. Executive Educator, v9 n11 p12,30 Nov. Forecasts no major surprises during the U.S. Supreme Court's 1987-88 term. Like the "Edwards v. Aguillard" ruling against Louisiana's creation science law, upcoming decisions concerning religious issues (controversial textbooks and moments of silence) and free speech (language use and controversial subject matter in student publications) will probably uphold existing school policies. (MLH)…
(1988). This Ruling Ushers Religion into a School Auditorium. American School Board Journal, v175 n6 p20 Jun. A Pennsylvania case shows that once a school auditorium becomes a designated public forum, the free speech clause of the First Amendment requires the board to allow other similarly situated outsiders (including religious groups) to use the facilities for expressive activity. Another Pennsylvania case involving dual employment upheld a teacher's discharge from a city police department. (MLH)…
(1984). Democratic Consensus and the Young: A Cross-National Comparison of Britain and America. Youth and Society, v15 n4 p429-43 Jun. One hundred ninety-nine American and 204 British university students were surveyed. They shared similar, strongly positive attitudes towards democratic "rules of the game," such as free speech, the role of law, and equality. But Americans showed a greater trust of government and a stronger sense of being able to affect the political process. (KH)…
(1997). Academia, Censorship, and the Internet. Journal of Information Ethics, v6 n2 p35-47 Fall. The availability of objectionable material on the Internet creates a conflict between the rights of computer users and universities. This article examines free speech and censorship; highlights responses by Carnegie Mellon University, University of Oklahoma, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and University of Pittsburgh; and proposes a framework for analyzing university responses to information content. (PEN)…
(1997). The Santa Rosa Case: Women-Only Forums on the Internet and the First Amendment. Journal of Information Ethics, v6 n2 p48-63 Fall. Provides an overview of a case at Santa Rosa Junior College in which the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights found that single sex Internet bulletin boards operated by educational institutions receiving federal financial assistance violate federal sex equity law. Discusses free speech, sexual harassment and women only forums, and ethics and community norms. (PEN)…
(1997). The V-Chip–Victory or Vendetta?. Contemporary Education, v68 n2 p114-17 Win. Parents can install the v-chip microchip in their televisions to block out programs high in violence, sex, or other objectional material. Examines the views of supporters, who see it as a coping tool for the information age and of detractors who see it as an affront to the First Amendment guarantee of free speech. (SM)…
(1996). Hawkers, Thieves and Lonely Pamphleteers: Distributing Publications in the University Marketplace. Journal of College and University Law, v22 n4 p935-70 Spr. Issues that college administrators must address in forming policy about publications to be distributed on campus are considered, and the important parties and their interests are identified. Constitutional and practical problems created by restrictions on distribution are also examined. Finally, newspaper theft, a recently emerging campus problem, is considered in the context of free speech policy. (MSE)…
(1997). Supreme Court Declines To Hear Appeal Over College's Harassment Policy. Chronicle of Higher Education, v43 n29 pA14 Mar 28. The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear a case that might guide colleges in resolving conflict between campus policies on sexual harassment and free-speech rights. The case involved San Bernardino College (California) and a tenured professor whose explicit classroom discussions college officials felt constituted sexual harassment. An appeals court had ruled unanimously against the college. (MSE)…